Search for: All records

Ruddlesden–Popper perovskites (RPPs) are promising materials for optoelectronic devices. While iodide‐based RPPs are well‐studied, the crystallization of mixed‐halide RPPs remains less explored. Understanding the factors affecting their formation and crystallization are vital for optimizing morphology, phase purity, and orientation, which directly impact device performance. Here, we investigate the crystallization and properties of mixed‐halide RPPs (PEA)₂FA_n−1Pb_n(Br_1/3I_2/3)_3n + 1(PEA = C₆H₅(CH₂)₂NH₃⁺and FA = CH(NH₂)₂⁺) (n = 1, 5, 10) using DMSO ((CH₃)₂SO) or NMP (OC₄H₆NCH₃) as cosolvents and MACl (MA = CH₃NH₃⁺) as an additive. For the first time, the presence of planar defects in RPPs is directly observed by in situ grazing‐incidence wide‐angle X‐ray scattering (GIWAXS) and confirmed through the simulation of the patterns that matched the experimental. GIWAXS data also reveals that DMSO promotes higher crystallinity and vertical orientation, while MACl enhances crystal quality but increases halide segregation, shown here by nano X‐ray fluorescence (nano‐XRF) experiments. For low‐n RPPs, orientation is crucial for solar cell efficiency, but its impact decreases with increasing n. Our findings provide insights into optimizing mixed‐halide RPPs, guiding strategies to improve crystallization, phase control, and orientation for better performance not only in solar cells but also in other potential optoelectronic devices. 

Abstract Emerging photovoltaics (PVs) focus on a variety of applications complementing large scale electricity generation. Organic, dye‐sensitized, and some perovskite solar cells are considered in building integration, greenhouses, wearable, and indoor applications, thereby motivating research on flexible, transparent, semitransparent, and multi‐junction PVs. Nevertheless, it can be very time consuming to find or develop an up‐to‐date overview of the state‐of‐the‐art performance for these systems and applications. Two important resources for recording research cells efficiencies are the National Renewable Energy Laboratory chart and the efficiency tables compiled biannually by Martin Green and colleagues. Both publications provide an effective coverage over the established technologies, bridging research and industry. An alternative approach is proposed here summarizing the best reports in the diverse research subjects for emerging PVs. Best performance parameters are provided as a function of the photovoltaic bandgap energy for each technology and application, and are put into perspective using, e.g., the Shockley–Queisser limit. In all cases, the reported data correspond to published and/or properly described certified results, with enough details provided for prospective data reproduction. Additionally, the stability test energy yield is included as an analysis parameter among state‐of‐the‐art emerging PVs.